An exploit targeting the AFX bridge has drained a reported $24.15 million in USDC, according to unconfirmed reports of the incident. Details of how the attacker accessed the cross-chain infra
An exploit targeting the AFX bridge has drained a reported $24.15 million in USDC, according to unconfirmed reports of the incident. Details of how the attacker accessed the cross-chain infrastructure have not been independently verified, and the figures remain preliminary.
The loss involves USDC, the dollar-pegged stablecoin whose value is designed to track $1, giving any drained balance a clear dollar-denominated size. Public market pages for USDC track its supply and trading across chains. For related coverage, see Bitwise ETF Clients Buy $6.55 Million in XRP: What It Signals.
Because the reported figures come from a single early account, the exact exploit mechanism, the affected chains, and the final loss total should be treated as unconfirmed until the project or on-chain data confirms them.
Bridges hold pooled assets to move tokens between blockchains, which concentrates value in a single contract and makes that infrastructure a recurring target for attackers. A drained bridge can affect anyone whose funds were locked in it.
The pattern is familiar across recent incidents. Allbridge, another cross-chain protocol, was paused after a $1.65 million Solana exploit, and a separate suspected Hedera exploit was linked to funds moved onto Ethereum.
Because stablecoins carry a fixed dollar value, a loss denominated in USDC is immediately legible as a headline dollar figure, which tends to amplify concerns about liquidity and user trust more than a loss in a volatile token would. Stablecoin supply and chain distribution are tracked on public stablecoin dashboards.
A loss of this size typically shifts attention to the affected project's response: whether it pauses the bridge, publishes an incident report, and communicates directly with users. No official statement from AFX has been confirmed in the available evidence.
Users will want clarity on whether withdrawals are affected, how much exposure remains, and whether any reimbursement is planned. Some projects have moved quickly on this front; Gnosis Pay, for example, refunded users after a $1.8 million exploit.
Others have taken a different route. In one recent case, an Ethereum DeFi exploit left affected participants with little recourse, underscoring that outcomes vary widely.
Further details, including the confirmed loss amount and the attack vector, may change as investigators and the project publish verified information.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Read original article on nftenex.com
